Welcome

....to JusticeGhana Group

 Welcome to JusticeGhana

JusticeGhana is a Non-Governmental [and-not-for- profit] Organization (NGO) with a strong belief in Justice, Security and Progress....” More Details

NPP Picks August 30 For Special Congress

contest

Photo ReportingNPP Picks August 30 For Special Congress

Leadership of the New Patriotic Party (NPP) will today meet to finalise arrangements for its impending National Delegates’ Congress to elect a flagbearer.

Ahead of the scheduled meetings of the National Executive Committee (NEC) and the National Council (NC) of the party, the Steering Committee, made up of national officers of the NPP, are said to have proposed Saturday August 30, 2014, for the Special Congress to prune down the number of the presidential aspirants from seven to five as provided by its constitution.

{sidebar id=10 align=right}Seven people filed their papers to contest the flagbearship position at the close of nominations on July 7, 2014.

A source at the party’s Asylum Down national headquarters told DAILY GUIDE that a number of proposals had been received and deliberated upon at the Steering Committee meeting held last Friday.

They were also said to have proposed Saturday November 1, 2014, as the possible date for the National Delegates’ Congress after the five have been settled on.

The earlier suggestion of December 6, 2014, appears to have been discarded, making the November 1, a compromise date for the proponents of early and late congress.

The committee of regional chairmen had advocated for September as the period for the congress while some members of the party had even suggested next year to allow for a restructuring exercise, against the party’s constitution.

The NEC, comprising national officers, regional chairmen and other selected individuals of the party, is therefore expected to meet this morning to consider the proposed dates as to be presented by the General Secretary, Kwabena Agyepong and forward its decision later in the day to the National Council – the highest decision-making body after Congress – for ratification.

The new National Council will be constituted before the meeting, with the recently elected regional representatives taking their seats.

The re-constitution of the National Council was occasioned by a law suit filed by David Hoezame, former Constituency Chairman of Central Tongu in the Volta Region, challenging the previous composition of the Council.

Hoezame Case Thrown Out

Even though an Accra High Court presided over by Justice Ofori Atta yesterday threw out Hoezame’s case, the party had gone ahead to elect the regional representatives to constitute the Council – as demanded by Hoezame.

By the close of day today, the NPP is expected to put out firm dates for the two events which would lead to the election of a standard bearer to lead the party to the 2016 general elections.

The seven aspirants contesting for the presidential slot are two-time flagbearer, Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo; twice-defeated flagbearer hopeful, Alan Kwadwo Kyerematen; former Offinso North MP, Dr. Kofi Konadu Apraku; MP for Esikado-Ketan who doubles as 2nd Deputy Speaker of Parliament, Joe Ghartey; former MP for Mfanstiman West, Stephen Asamoah-Boateng; the MP for Asuogyaman, Kofi Osei-Ameyaw as well as Mampong MP, Francis Addai-Nimo.

Provisions

Article 12 (5) B of the NPP’s constitution states that “where there are more than five contestants for nomination as the party’s Presidential candidate, a Special Electoral College shall cast their votes by secret ballot for the first five contestants to be short-listed.”

It proceeds to talk about the composition of the electoral college which includes “the National Council, National Executive Council, Regional Executive Committees, National Council of Elders, Members of Parliament, three representatives of each of THE special organs of the party, past National Officers, three representatives each from every external branch, Founding Members during the registration of the party at the Electoral Commission, all New Patriotic Party card-bearing Ministers when the party is in government.”

Even though some have made suggestions as to how the voting should be conducted for the Special Congress in the face of a provision in the party’s Constitution which states categorically that “every delegate shall be entitled to one vote” one of the founding members, Professor Aaron Mike Oquaye, insists there is no ambiguity in the statute.

One-man, One Vote

Prof. Oquaye, who is a celebrated historian and lawyer, stated in a recent write-up that, “Every delegate is entitled to one vote in accordance with Article 12 (5) (B), and depending on the number of votes that each contestant receives, the first five contestants will be shortlisted accordingly. This means that they will be ranked according to the number of votes cast in favour of each contestant.”

Other details of the Special Congress and the main National Delegates’ Congress, including venue and modalities for the events, are also expected to be made known after today’s crucial meeting.

By Charles Takyi-Boadu

Source: Daily Guide/Ghana

Three extra women in cabinet is hardly a whiteguymageddon

reshuffle

Esther McVey, one of three new Tory women promoted to cabinet. Photograph: Guy Corbishley/Demotix/CorbisThree extra women in cabinet is hardly a whiteguymageddon

The mere hint of equal opportunities reveals the deep fear in the body politic

Suzanne Moore

Quite rightly, the appearance of the rampaging hordes of women whom David Cameron has promoted has been criticised. They do not look like men. They are not in navy suits. What are these "new girls" thinking while strutting their stuff on the Downing Street catwalk? Why have they not done away with their own bodies and hair and all their awkward woman-type things? What are they thinking? Well certainly not about policies. They are there to smooth over and sell what has already been decided. Maybe that is why I don't much care about the painted nails of the handmaidens of privatisation.

{sidebar id=10 align=right}But, really, we were led to believe there would be more of this monstrous regiment, hordes of these devil women. Actually, two and a half were promoted to cabinet. I count Esther McVey as half because she kept the same job but can now attend cabinet. Cameron's 2010 cabinet had four women; four years later, we have seven. And a half. I ask you, can this feminist madness ever stop?

The other disappointment is that none of these women were dripping with blood, holding the severed heads of random middle-aged men. We were told of a cull. A purge. Knives. A blood bath. I had imagined Theresa May Tasered up, wearing one of her Blake's 7 outfits that I like very much.

The choice of such visceral language by the establishment at the mere idea of a hint of equal opportunities reveals the deep fear in the body politic. The fantasy of blood and sacrifice and absolute destruction reveals the odd interior lives of the Tories and their pet media pals. Where, in fact, was whiteguymageddon? Who controlled it? Actually, some white guys: Cameron, George Osborne and Lynton Crosby.

Most people won't care two hoots about the reshuffle. Michael Gove won't be in charge of schools, but he will be on TV more. He had to be decommissioned even though he has largely succeeded in what he set out to do, whereas Iain Duncan Smith was kept on precisely because to move him would reveal what a failure he has been. Both are ideologues central to this government, but Gove is charming and intelligent and will be back.

William Hague, whom I once had the joy of following around America when he was leader and was trying to learn lessons in "compassionate conservatism" from George Bush and Henry Kissinger (yes, really), has been semi-disengaged for a while. No one at the time knew who he was, and I had to explain to a classroom full of confused Puerto Rican schoolgirls that he was nothing at all to do with the Spice Girls. It has been downhill ever since, and he has annoyed the right wing again by being contaminated by another woman: Angelina Jolie.

Many of these 90s figures had to make way inevitably, as the Tory party moves ever rightwards. This is why we have nonsensical headlines such as "Cameron targets women and Ukip". The UK Independence party is a small political party and women are the majority of the population. Surely a category error – unless "Tories target men and Monster Raving Loonies" works too.

Yet again, the peculiar anxieties of the middle-aged man have been given voice. This self-pitying bleat of entitlement is strange indeed. As Jeremy Paxman, another moaning minnie, said of the BBC: "The worst thing you can be in this industry now is a middle-class white male." Right? Exactly what kind of awful discrimination did he suffer in his long career? Maybe I missed the endless parade of women and working-class people who ran the BBC?

Truly, these guys are showing their roots. For in order to maintain this persecution complex, that their power will be taken away by those who should not have it, those who do not look like them, they have to create a threatening fantasy world. Hence their hyperbole. The reality is that middle-aged white guys do run things.

Their indignation produces this performative gynophobia, reducing women to a series of body parts, sidebars of shame and blame. With our legs, "derrières", hair and nails, all flashing and attention-grabbing. Even our handbags are suspect, and you don't have to read Freud to know what that symbolises. What do we keep in there? Sometimes a bag is just a bag, even when it belongs to a powerful woman.

The slaughterhouse narrative undercuts the cosmetic one. Labour, too, talks about "a massacre" of the moderates. All of this is quite frankly barmy. The only style detail that matters is that Ken Clarke will be tapping his Hush Puppies elsewhere.

For all the fuss, the Tory makeover is just a quick pre-electoral touch up. Their membership is not selecting women for safe seats. The fundamental problems remain. Cabinet has only one non-white person, no openly gay people. Crazy diversity is represented by a bloke with a beard. Historic!

This remains the party of the male, pale and stale, even as it shows off its female talent. Cameron wants to say that all the ladies can join in after all. A true moderniser would have promoted a far greater range of people before now and without patronising them. Cutey Cameron has flashed his ruthlessness in an enviable display of manly power. The ensuing hysteria has done no one, least of all women, any favours at all. Calm down, dears.

Source: The Guardian UK

EPA: The Bond of 1844 Reincarnated?

legal history

Photo ReportingEPA: The Bond of 1844 Reincarnated?

…Certainly Not. Yes, ECOWAS had unveiled its long suspected marriage to the EPA. So we may argue it’s yet another ploy to re-colonization. But Think Again. When Nana Kwamena Ansah negotiated with the Portuguese traders on the building of a trading Post at Elmina; he contractually, did bind himself and his subjects but not for the Ga-Adangbe or the Ewes. He could yes; not have even done the same on behalf of his immediate cousins in Afutu or Half-Assini, unless he was powerful enough to have asserted that authority, either by conquest or negotiations

BRIEFS & MEMOS

Why the Debate Over EPAs? WE’RE BOUND BY OUR SIGNATURE. In L’Estrange v F. Graucob Ltd [1934] 2 KB 394, the claimant bought an automatic slot machine from the defendants. She signed an order from which contained a clause which excluded liability for express and implied warranties. When the claimant discovered that the machine did not work she brought an action against the defendants for breach of an implied warranty that the machine was fit for purpose for which it was sold. Judgement was given for the defendants on the grounds that they had excluded their liability by virtue of the exclusion clause which was incorporated into the contract by the claimant’s signature, even though the exclusion was ‘regrettably small print’ and had not been read by the claimant. Ewan Mckendrick (2003) writes that given the widespread use of contracts which rely heavily upon the use of small print, such a rule appears singularly unfortunate, especially in its application to consumers. The Ontario Court of Appeal in Tilden Rent-a-Car Co. v Clendennin (1978) 83 DLR (3d) 400 recognised that many standard form printed contracts are signed without being read or understood. The court accordingly, held that a signature could only be relied upon as evidence of genuine consent when it was reasonable for the party relying on the signed document to believe that the signer did assent to the onerous terms proposed [1].

INTRODUCTION

At the dawn of Gold Coast’s independence struggles, one of the silent accusations waged by the rising intelligentsias [in]directly at our forefathers, especially, those Fanti Chiefs who were signatories to the Fante Bond of 18844 [2], on their failures to comprehend or pay critical scrutiny at the consequences of the contents and the wording of the Bond, which on 06 March 1844, the contracting parties of the Fante Confederacy, probably, freely thumb-printed, to the satisfaction of Commander H.W. Hill- the then Governor of the Gold Coast, for and on behalf of the British Crown, in faraway the United Kingdom. It came as no surprise that some 100 years on, the contents and the interpretations given to this agreement erupted contentious debate upon which colonization was persistently resisted, agitated and defeated. Our reminder in 2014 is for the ruling intelligentsias to seek for a diligent bargain, terms and conditions in the emerging European Partnership Agreement (EPA) that promises the needs of the unborn generations.


COMMENTARY

In our article- “Tribute to Justice Cecilia Addow”, we commented that the L’Estrange rule on signature does not apply where a signature had been procured by fraud, misrepresentation or the defence of non est factum- (‘this is not my deed’), is made. Non est Factum is where an illiterate person signed a deed which had been read out to him incorrectly by another person. The effect here is to render the deed void so that a third party cannot obtain good title under it. We are advised that the rule had to grapple with two competing policies: Firstly, the injustice of holding a person to a bargain in which he has not brought a consenting mind and the necessity of holding a person to a document which he has signed, especially where innocent third parties rely to their detriment upon the validity of the signature. [1]

Thus legally, the Non est Factum defence is unavailability to the careless. In the United Dominions Trust Ltd. v. Western [1976] QB 153, the defendant signed a loan agreement with the claimant company in connection with the purchase of a car and left it to the garage owner to fill in the details, including the price. The garage owner inflated the price of the car and the claimant company paid over the money to the garage owner in good faith. It was held that the onus was on the defendant to show that, allowing the form to be filled in by the garage owner, he had acted carefully as he had wholly failed to discharge that onus and therefore could not invoke Non est Factum. The historical Bond of 1844 acknowledged the power and jurisdiction of the British Government over the Fante areas whose predate Gold Coast Chiefs- notably, heirs to Nana Kwamina Ansah, [in]advertently, affirmed British jurisdiction over criminal civil case and promised to ‘mould the customs of the country to the general principles of British law’. [2]

The colonization of Gold Coast took this legal angle [2]: (1) the passage of British Settlement Acts, 1843, enabled Orders in Council to be made providing for the establishment of laws, institutions and ordinances for peace, order and good governance of Her Majesty’s subjects and others; and (2) the Foreign Jurisdiction Act, 1843, which mandated the exercise of political powers acquired by agreement or usage territories which had not become part of the British dominion by cession or conquest. In 1844, an Order in Council was made in pursuance of the Foreign Jurisdiction Act and the British Settlement Act requiring “judicial authorities in the Gold Coast when exercising jurisdiction among the indigenous peoples to observe such local customs as were compatible with the principles of the law of England and in default of such customs to proceed in all things as nearly as may be in line with the laws of England.”

Although the 1850 Constitution for Forts and Settlements is deemed as a milestone in Gold Coast’s legal history as administratively; the forts and settlements of the Gold Coast ceased to rely on Sierra Leone and accordingly, were given its Governor, assisted by Legislative and Executive Council, the day EPA will be finally signed could also be equated to that of the Fante Bond of 1844, as for the first time in post-independence Gold Coast, Ghana shall, unconditionally, have 100% access to European markets while it allows some 70% to the European Union. In the words of European Commission, Economic EPAs are trade and development agreements negotiated between the EU and African, Caribbean and Pacific regions engaged in a regional economic integration process [3]. Historically, Ghana-European trading dates back to 1471, where the Portuguese first arrived in Gold Coast. They were hosted by Nana Kwamena Ansah of Edina and his elders who offered them a parcel of land at their fishing coast where under the leadership of Don Diego d’Azambuja and his 600 soldiers, built a trading post in 1482. [4]

So, Adigwe(1975)- the Nigerian writer and solicitor, might be right: “Long before its colonization by the British, the Gold Coast, [now Ghana] was a focal point of European commercial activities. From the 16th century to the dawn of the nineteenth century, the trade settlements of the Dutch, Danes and the Britons spread along the coast. The purchase by the British, of the Dutch and Danish trade settlements in the early part of nineteenth century paved the way for the eventual transformation of the territory into the British Colony. Although the extension of British authority over the coastal territories took place in 1821, it was the Fante Bond of 1844 which should be regarded as a milestone in the establishment of British authority in the Gold Coast Colony.” Ghana attained its political self-rule on 6 March 1957. [5]

Lt. Commander H.W. Hill reached an agreement with the Fanti Confederacy on 06 March 1844. The Bond acknowledged the power of and jurisdiction which had been defacto exercised in their territories adjacent to the British Forts and Settlements and declared that the first object of law are the protection of individuals and property and that human sacrifices, panyarring or the kidnapping of hostages of debt and other barbarous customs are abominations and contrary to law. The Chiefs of the Confederacy agreed that serious crimes should be tried by British judicial officers sitting with the chiefs moulding the customs of the community to the general principles of British law. [2] Panyarring was said to be the practice of seizing and holding persons until the repayment of debt or resolution of a dispute which became a common activity along the Atlantic coast of Africa in the 18th and 19th centuries.

According to Toby Green(2011), the term was derived from the Portuguese apanhar- meaning to “catch” or “seize”, and may also have been related to the term penhorar, to “pledge”. “Its use, along with caboceer – derived from the Portuguese cabeça, meaning “head” – showed how important the Portuguese role had been in procuring slaves and negotiating with African authorities. “Research has indeed shown how slaves in Atlantic West Africa were usually either seized in warfare, offered for ransom after a raid, or pledged as security for credit and then sold into the Atlantic trade if the credit was not repaid.” [6] New Times reports [7] that the Portuguese’s stay at Elmina was cut short by the Dutch who had fought and defeated them in 1637 with the help of locals. “The local residents had thought that by helping the Dutch, they would stop slave trade… [But] extended the dungeons and continued with slave trade. The Dutch stayed at the castle for 235 years, from 1637-1872, while the Portuguese occupied it for 155 years, from 1482-1637. The British used it for 85 years, between 1872 and 1957.”

This article seeks neither to evaluate the pros and cons of Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade nor the contractual efficacy upon which the foundations of the Bond of 1844 or protectorate/ colonial status was contracted. Suffice to mention in passing that once upon a time, some gallant anti-slavery abolitionists such as: William Lloyd Garrison, Frederick Douglass, Harriet Tubman and William Lloyd Still, in the United States, saw slave trade as evil and called for the end of the institution of slavery. [8] Today, the Elmina Castle- once an intended friendly trading post/castle has now turned out as one of the terrifying slave castles in the world, and is being preserved as one of the UNESCO heritage sites. In 1984, some local chiefs in Ghana issued a public apology to Africans in the Diaspora, regretting the complicity of their forefathers in slave trade. In 2001 there was an international conference on racism in South Africa, where African raised the issue of reparations and demanded an ‘apology’ for the slave trade, but European only stated that they ‘regret’ it. The US and its EU allies feared that an apology, an admission of guilt would certainly bring legal consequences and force the payment of reparations in some form [9].

Accordingly, the final wording of the conference’s declaration on slavery was agreed as follows: “We acknowledge that slavery and slave trading, including the trans-Atlantic slave trade, were appalling tragedies in the history of humanity, not only because of their inherent barbarism, but also in terms of their magnitude, organised nature and especially their negation of the essence of victims.” It would be recalled that the US’ delegation led by the then Secretary of State- General Colin Powell (rtd) walked out of the conference before this declaration was agreed, over criticism of Israel. [9] Reparation movement which started in the 1990s Africa defines it to mean- making, amends, or compensating for damages. The feeling is that Africans and those in Diaspora had a legitimate claim for compensation for the exploitation suffered under slavery and colonialism. So in 1993, a conference on reparations in led to the Abuja [Nigeria] Declaration calling for national committees to be set up to campaign for reparations.

Opponents to EPAs argue both in private and public that similar to the Bond of 1844 which allegedly; corrupted the hearts and minds of the predate Gold Coast chief with schnapps, sugar, gunpowder in an exchange for gold and other natural resources for European and American markets, and gradually evaporated into man-hunt, seizure at gunpoint and eventual exportation and slavery, the EPA needs a closer scrutiny of the terms and conditions embedded in the 70-by-100% EU-Africa trade deal. Thus from the suspicions of the 21st century Ghanaian, the ongoing bargain could be interpreted as an overture (French ouverture; German Ouvertüre, Vorspiel; i.e. opening) in music- a term originally applied to the instrumental introduction to an opera. According to Blom [10], during the early Romantic era, composers such as Beethoven and Mendelssohn began to use the term overture to refer to independent, self-existing instrumental, programmatic works that presaged genres such as the symphonic poem.

“These were ‘at first undoubtedly intended to be played at the head of a programme’. In 19th-century opera the overture, Vorspiel, Einleitung, Introduction, or whatever else it may be called, is generally nothing more definite than that portion of the music which takes place before the curtain rises.”[ibid] But the argument had been that long before the arrival of the Europeans at the Coast of Gulf of Guinea, the practice of slavery was prominent within many African cultures and that even today; there exists all forms of slavery[and exploitations]. How, just, could one equate EPA to the Bond of 1844? Charles Taliaferro, Paul Draper and Philip L. Quinn, define reincarnation as religious or philosophical concept that the soul or spirit, after biological death, begins a new life in a new body. [11] “The EPAs will be broad agreements, helping first of all to build regional markets and diversify economies in the ACP regions before opening up trade. They will build increased, balanced and sustainable trade between the two regions. They will change our relationship from one that offers tariff preferences - an eroding lifeline - to one that builds lasting and more efficient regional and international markets for the ACP [?]”[12]

Yes; commenting on the Cariforum-European Commission Economic Partnership Agreement (CSME) Professor Norman Girvan observed that the EPA appears to have significant implications for national and regional development, for the region’s autonomy in policy-making and for its ability to fashion a CSME that responds to its own choices and priorities. “I believe that the issues that arise buttress the arguments for full public disclosure, public explanation and public discussion of the EPA.”[13] Public disclosure, states OECD, refers to the act of making information or data readily accessible and available to all interested individuals and institutions. “Public disclosure may take include: verbal or written statements released to a public forum, to the news media, or to the general public; publication in an official bulletin, gazette, report, or stand-alone document; and information posted on a website.” [14] But Africa’s problem is not only with quality and productivity capacity but also EU’s demanded checks on standards.

 

CONCLUSION

Having said, it might have been accepted that the threats facing Ghana or Africa as whole, is not re-colonization through trading overtures but rather our inabilities to enhance the very colonial legacies- ‘institutions and indesigns’ that we dearly uphold, to meet the 21st-century challenges and complexes that haunt the wellbeing of the vast majority of Africans. In law, for an agreement to be a legally binding contract, it must contain four vital elements: offer, acceptance, intention to create legal relations and consideration. Unlike in Nana Kwamena Ansah’s case, in democracy, it is expected that parliament still remained the most important and influential arm of government and would have the final say before the EPA agreement could be signed or certified. So EPA cannot be the Bond of 1844 reincarnated unless the Ghanaian MP, so intended.

Asante Fordjour authored this Article for The OmanbaPa Research Group

JusticeGhana

…………


References

[1] Fordjour, Asante, “Tribute to Justice Cecilia Addow”, http://www.justiceghana.com/index.php/en/2012-01-24-13-49-19/6378-tribute-to-justice-cecilia-koranteng-addow?showall=&start=1

[2] Report of Parliamentary Select Committee of West Coast of Africa, August 1842

[3] EPA, http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/development/economic-partnerships/

[4] Ramerini, Marco, The European Forts in Ghana, http://www.colonialvoyage.com/european-forts-in-ghana/#

[5] Adigwe, Francis, Essentials of Government for West Africa, University Press Ltd., Logos, Nigeria

[6] Green, Toby (2011) Introduction - Rethinking the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade from a Cultural Perspective (1300-1589) pp. 1-28, Cambridge University Press, http://ebooks.cambridge.org/chapter.jsf?bid=CBO9781139016407&cid=CBO9781139016407A009

[7] “Ghana’s slave castle, the only place where God ‘lives”, http://www.newtimes.co.rw/news/views/article_print.php?15239&a=13759&week=2&icon=Print

[8] Abolitionism, http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h477.html

[9] Reparations, http://discoveringbristol.org.uk/slavery/after-slavery/wider-world/african-diaspora/reparations/

[10] Blom, Eric (ed.), 1954; Blom 1954, 469.[cited from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overture

[11] Taliaferro, Charles, Draper, Quinn, Paul Philip L. A Companion to Philosophy of Religion. John Wiley and Sons, 2010, page 640, Google Books [cited from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reincarnation]

[12] Economic Partnership Agreements(EPAs)– guide, European Commission, http://www.eubusiness.com/topics/trade/epa-/

[13] Girvan, Norman, Financial Gleaner, http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20080125/business/business8.html

[14] OECD, "PUBLIC DISCLOSURE", http://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=6139

 

Gender Ministry Makes Cash Payment to Beneficiaries of the Livelihood Empowerment Aagainst Poverty (LEAP) Programme

governance

Nana Oye-LithurGender Ministry Makes Cash Payment

A total of 72,780 beneficiary households of the Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP) Programme in 100 districts in all ten (10) regions across the country are set to receive GHC 9,128,856m from 21st to 25h July, 2014.

The amount which is the Government of Ghana’s social intervention cash payments for their children. This is a strategy to promote the welfare of the vulnerable and excluded in the society.

While 8,324 beneficiary households in 10 districts from seven regions will receive their payments electronically, 64,456 would be paid manually.

The electronic payment is the Ministry’s latest innovation in the cash transfer Programme aimed at reducing transaction costs for government and recipients, faster payments and reconciliation after payments, reducing waiting and travel times for beneficiaries as well as promoting financial inclusion and supporting the trend of cashless transactions among others. The July payment is the 5th Cycle of the electronic payment pilot.

A significant number of 7,860 Persons with disability households currently benefit from the bi-monthly cash grant transfer programme. As the programme expands to cover another 4,676 beneficiary households, this number of persons with severe disability and no productive capacity is expected to increase.

The Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty Programme (LEAP) is the flagship programme of Ghana’s National Social Protection Strategy administered by the Ministry of Gender, Children and Social Protection under the Department of Social welfare.

The Government of Ghana under its National Social Protection Strategy (NSPS), implements a number of pro-poor interventions through different Sector Ministries. To ensure effective and efficient coordination, planning and implementation as well as value for money, the Ministry of Gender, Children and Social Protection which is mandated to coordinate these pro-poor interventions, is setting up a National Targeting Unit.

The Targeting Unit aims at identifying, characterizing and providing a data on poor and vulnerable households in Ghana to create a single National Single Registry System. With this Single registry, the Unit can progressively expand the implementation of Social Protection interventions. It would also ensure the vulnerable poor have access to the benefits offered by various Social Protection Programmes.

Through the LEAP Programme, government is improving the lives of its citizens, reducing the level of poverty in the nation, and increasing the socio-economic standard. Many households and individuals have been able to provide for their basic needs, and had access to education, health and food. Beneficiaries have also had some capital to start small-scale business ventures for sustainable income to ultimately stay out of abject poverty.

This economic growth is within the framework of the Ghana Shared Growth and Development Agenda (GSRDA). This also complements the vision of the MDGs which were designed to rid the world of the extremes of poverty.

As the country strives to attain improved economic status, it is important that we ensure equitable and sustainable development towards a positive social change by putting in such interventions that would address issues of vulnerability.

The Ministry of Gender, Children and Social protection reiterates its commitment to ensuring the protection of the vulnerable and promotion of gender equality through the design and implementation of policies and programmes that address such needs.

Signed

Mercy C. Adjabeng (Mrs.)

Communication & Advisor

Ministry of Gender, children and Social Protection

Kufuor Advocates Scrapping Of Vice President Post

governance

Photo Reporting: Ex-President J.A. KufuorKufuor Advocates Scrapping Of Vice President Post

Former President John Agyekum Kufuor is calling for changes in the governance structure, especially in the executive and the legislative arms of government.

The former President advocated the scrapping the position of Vice President; to be replaced by a Prime Minister with the responsibility of leading government business in Parliament.

He said the Prime Minister should be made to be accountable to Parliament while the President concentrates on other business of national importance.

Former President Kufuor made the call when members of the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) Winner Takes All (WTA) Advisory Committee paid a courtesy call on him at his residence in Accra.

The meeting was intended to solicit his opinion on whether the winner takes all system of governance should be abolished after being practised for more than 20 years.

He said, another area in the governance structure that needs change is the Council of State, to be replaced by a Second Chamber of Parliament.

He said, the Second Chamber whose membership should be non-partisan should be made responsible for the vetting of ministers and judges, including overseeing the activities of the first chamber.

“The establishment of the Second Chamber of Parliament must sound costly, but we should think of its value, which will strengthen our democracy and institutions,” he said.

Former President Kufuor also advocated the extension of the term of the presidency to five years from the current tenure of four years, with another chance for recontest.

He said, the current four- year tenure is like a sprint as it does not allow the President to do a solid work.

He explained that, with the proposed five-year period, the President would be able to use the first two years to get on top of issues, and then the other remaining years to implement his policies.

He said, there should also be a constitutional body apart from the Presidency to appoint the Electoral Commissioner with its tenure of office being determined.

Mr Kufuor said the Electoral Commissioner should not be given a security of tenure.

With regards to the proposal by the IEA WTA Advisory Committee over the introduction of proportional representation in Parliament, former President Kufuor thought otherwise.

He said, with the proportional representation, citizens who have the right to elect their representatives would be deprived of their right of choice.

He however called for the strengthening of institutions to be able to provide good governance.

Justice Emile Short, member of the IEA-WTA Advisory Committee commended the former President for his inputs and promise to give the issues he raised much consideration.

Source: GNA