....to JusticeGhana Group

 Welcome to JusticeGhana

JusticeGhana is a Non-Governmental [and-not-for- profit] Organization (NGO) with a strong belief in Justice, Security and Progress....” More Details

Court orders retallying of votes in 22 stations

User Rating:  / 1

Supreme Court judges Jackton Ojwang, CJ Willy Mutunga, and Philip Tunoi consult with a court official during proceedings on the Presidential election petition. Photo/BILLY MUTAI Kenya: Supreme Court orders retallying of votes in 22 stations

The Supreme Court has ordered a re-tallying of presidential election results in 22 polling stations to ascertain whether the votes cast exceeded the number of registered voters.

The court also ordered the scrutiny of Forms 34 from all the 33,400 polling stations and all Forms 36 used in the tallying of presidential votes.

“The parties are directed to jointly appoint 10 agents to act as observers. The result must be filed at the court registry by 4pm on Wednesday,” ruled Judge Wanjala.

Judge Wanjala said an oath of secrecy and confidentiality would be administered to the agents Tuesday morning by the registrar before the recount starts.

“The tallying will be done at a place chosen by the registrar,” ruled Mr Justice Wanjala. The affected polling stations are spread across the country.

Judge Wanjala made the ruling in the presence of his Supreme Court colleagues Jacton Ojwang, Philip Tunoi, Njoki Ndung’u and Mohammed Ibrahim and Chief Justice Willy Mutunga.

The judges said there would be scrutiny of all Form 34s and Forms 36 which were used by the polls agency IEBC in tallying presidential votes from all polling stations and the diaspora to establish valid votes cast, registered number of voters and votes cast.

The ruling came as President-elect Uhuru Kenyatta and Prime Minister Raila Odinga differed sharply over the issues that the Supreme Court should determine in the presidential election petitions.

The Supreme Court framed 14 issues for determination but Mr Kenyatta, the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) and its chairman Issack Hassan and deputy president-elect William Ruto said some of the issues had been left out.

Three voters contesting the role of rejected votes in the tallying also wanted the scope of issues for determination broadened.

However, Mr Odinga’s Coalition for Reform and Democracy (Cord) and Africa Centre for Open Governance (Africog), the civil society organisation challenging the tallying process, was happy with the issues as framed.

The judges directed the counsels representing the parties to meet over the issues for determination and report back on areas of consent. The court, which intends to further narrow down the issues for determination to five or less, would then rule on the sticking points.

“Meet and agree on the issues for determination then anything that you disagree upon we will determine (in the court),” said the Chief Justice.

Mr Kenyatta’s lawyer Fred Ngatia said the issues as drafted concentrated only on Mr Odinga’s petition and did not capture matters of jurisdiction that the respondents raised. “We must look at the issues which legitimately can be canvassed before the Supreme Court,” said Mr Ngatia.

IEBC through its counsel Orelio Rebello and its chairperson through his lawyer Ahmednassir Abdullahi agreed with Mr Ngatia that some issues had been left out.

By Galgallo Fayo and Edwin Mutai

Source: businessdailyafrica.com, 25 Mar 2013



 1000 Characters left

Antispam Refresh image Case sensitive

JusticeGhana Group *All Rights Reserved © 2007-2013*Privacy Policy